Nonicoclolasos

Samhälle kontra individ

John Stuart Mill får mina liberala känslor att svalla, då han i ”Of the Limits to the Authority of Society over the Individal” skriver:

But the strongest of all the arguments against the interference of the public with purely personal conduct, is that when it does interfere, the odds are that it interferes wrongly, and in the wrong place. On questions of social morality, of duty to others, the opinion of the public, that is, of an overruling majority, though often wrong, is likely to be still oftener right; because on such questions they are only required to judge of their own interests; of the manner in which some mode of conduct, if allowed to be practised, would affect themselves. But the opinion of a similar majority, imposed as a law on the minority, on questions of self-regarding conduct, is quite as likely to be wrong as right; for in these cases public opinion means, at the best, some people’s opinion of what is good or bad for other people; while very often it does not even mean that; the public, with the most perfect indifference, passing over the pleasure or convenience of those whose conduct they censure, and considering only their own preference.

Written by Niclas Berggren

6 september 2010 den 14:22

2 svar

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Är det bara jag som kommer att tänka på Ohly?

    Tom

    6 september 2010 at 15:02

  2. Tom: Inte jag iallafall. Han är helt enkelt inte snygg nog att sitta och tänka på.

    David Bergkvist

    6 september 2010 at 17:51


Kommentarer inaktiverade.

%d bloggare gillar detta: